|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Little Bighorn, Crow Agency, MT |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
June 25-26, 1876. The most celebrated military man in America at that time goes down fighting. The images are ingrained into American culture - Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer in the center of his men on top of a hill, pistols in hand while fierce Indian warriors circle them on horse back shooting bows and arrows. Is that what really happened? The Little Bighorn is not exactly off the beaten path and it is certainly not a geocaching oasis. But we are history buffs and it is such a fascinating place that we had to include it. Walking the ground of great and terrible events brings to mind questions like "What would have happened if..." or "Why did they do that?". The Little Bighorn is one of those places. We thought we knew what happened here, but found out we didn't know diddly. After three visits in five years and some lengthy research and cross-checking of our own for the web site, we ended up with more questions than answers. We're not the only ones. The Battlefield With the possible exception of Gettysburg, there has been more written about the Battle of the Little Bighorn than any other single event in American history. In fact, it may be the most studied battle of all. Yet, despite all the books, oral histories, archaeological digs, scholarly research, written records, Indian lore and other examinations, there is very little consensus on anything - except that Custer got killed that day. We visit battlefields and historical sites all over the country. They have their little mysteries and controversies at times, but nothing on the scale of the Little Bighorn. It's as volatile today as it was 124 years ago. The issues are endless - the time and length of the Last Stand, how Custer was killed, how big the Indian encampment was, how many warriors there were, how many men got killed in the Deep Ravine, why did Reno dismount at the river, could Benteen have reinforced in time, did the Indians have rifles, what kind and how many - and the opinions are just as endless. The two main rival camps appear to have historians on one side and archaeologists on the other. Historians rely heavily on battle records and interviews. Contrary to the belief that "there were no survivors" at the Little Bighorn, historians will tell you that there were thousands of survivors. Over half of Custer's regiment survived and walked the battlefield the next day. There were many Native American survivors and they told their stories in detail in the years following the battle but researchers consistently dismiss those reports as unreliable.
Archaeologists say that those reports do indeed need to be taken with a grain of salt. Native American accounts of the battle tend to exaggerate and embellish personal accomplishments, such as all the braves who claim to have shot Custer. A better research model is to use use artifacts and forensics to detail the battle, basically treating the battlefield like a crime scene using forensic science that didn't exist before. This conflict really escalated almost 30 years ago. In August 1983, a prairie fire swept over the entire battlefield, burning away 100 years of ungrazed grass and undergrowth. It revealed a treasure trove of artifacts and remains laying exposed on the charred surface. The National Park Service seized the opportunity to pursue archaeological examinations of the Little Bighorn. There were four of them - 1983, 1984, 1989 and 1994. They produced some results and theories which completely revised the traditional view of the battle. A sample of it can be found in this US News and World Report article from July 24, 2000. To which the historians reply you can't do reliable forensics on a scene that has been contaminated for over 100 years by exposure to the elements, re-enactments, relic hunters and tourists tromping all over the place. Well, you get the idea. I guess the archaeologists could counter that last one with "Sounds like the pyramids." Oral histories can be tainted by personal perspective, language barriers and the skill of the interviewer. They also tend to be embellished. All archaeological sites are contaminated to some degree. Therefore it stands to reason that neither side has completely reliable information. Their respective theories are built on incomplete data and subject to endless and fruitless examination. One thing you rarely see discussed are the actual conditions of the battlefield and the part that terrain and weather played. Prussian General Carl Von Clausewitz is credited with the concept of the "fog of war" meaning the inherent confusion and unexpected things that influence the outcome of a battle. That was probably a major factor in the chain of events at the Little Bighorn - including real fog. The plains of Montana are dusty and hazy especially in late afternoon. The battle area overlooking the river is steep and winding with deep ravines (called coulees) that can make horses and men disappear from sight, only to seemingly pop up out of nowhere someplace else. Add to that the dust from thousands of horse hooves and the smoke from the weapons and it is very likely that there was a pall over the entire battlefield that prevented direct observation, coordinated action or effective assessment. This obscuring of the battlefield would have affected the 7th Cavalry more than their opponents, who had home field advantage. Our little website is not going to solve the riddle of the Little Bighorn and we don't want to place ourselves in the middle of this controversy, which gets quite heated at times. Instead, we have chosen to present some noteworthy things we saw there or found in our own research, along with some ideas for visiting the battlefield today. The Battle
Contrary to popular folklore, Custer was not an experienced Indian fighter. His only real Indian fight before the Little Bighorn was Washita River in November 1868 - eight years earlier. Custer was at heart a horse soldier who proved his mettle many times during the Civil War. But the Little Bighorn was not a cavalry battle. It was a dismounted infantry fight. Most of the fighting was on foot and low to the ground. There are two reasons for this. Nine years earlier at the Wagon Box Fight in Wyoming, Native American warriors had been schooled on the futility of charging headlong into massed rifle fire, especially repeaters. In that furious action, 26 troopers with new breech-loading rifles and six civilian woodcutters with 16-shot lever action Henry rifles held off 1,000 braves for most of a day and lived to tell about it. One of the Indian leaders that day was Crazy Horse, the tactical leader at the Little Bighorn. By the time of the battle, his braves had repeaters of their own, which Custer's men did not. The other factor is that Custer's men left their sabers back at their home base to save weight. That means they had no close in weapon with which to fight from horseback. A cavalry charge was the armored assault of its day, depending on audacity, shock, momentum and violence to carry out its mission. That meant cold steel and flashing blades at a full gallop. Instead, Custer's force had to dismount to fight with their single shot Springfield rifles. The Indians had lances, tomahawks and war clubs for close in fighting and got better use out of cavalry tactics than Custer did. If Custer had maintained the ability to fight close in on horseback, the outcome may have been very different. Why would a experienced horse soldier like Custer leave the sabers behind? Probably the same reason anybody leaves something behind. They don't think they'll need it
Custer's regiment had 647 men in 12 companies, which he split into four groups. One company was left behind to guard the pack train. Two columns of three companies each, led by Major Marcus Reno and Captain Frederick Benteen, were to attack the Indian encampment from the southeast and cut off escape routes. Custer, with a column of five companies totaling 210 men, would move northwest, cross the river above the village and attack as the main effort from that direction. As he moved along Battle Ridge and the size of the encampment became apparent, he deployed two companies to mutually support each other and protect his rear - Company L commanded by Lt. James Calhoun and Company I commanded by Captain Myles Keogh. Before Custer's reckoning, they fought fought last stands of their own. Their battles have prominent markers on the driving tour of the battlefield. This cut off Custer from supplies and reinforcement. By that time, Custer's plan had already fallen apart. Thousands of Native American braves - Lakota, Cheyenne, Blackfeet and Arapaho - swarmed out of the encampment and attacked. Reno's attack turned into a panicked every-man-for-himself retreat and Benteen never fully deployed. He moved to the pack train where Reno's survivors were congregating and organized a defense.
At this point in the battle, no one knew Custer's location or his situation, but they could probably tell from the smoke and gunfire in the distance that a major battle was in progress. Earlier, Benteen had received a message from Custer telling him to catch up and bring more ammo. Benteen and Reno judged that they couldn't get through to Custer, but Captain Thomas Weir, commanding D Company, decided to give it a try. They reached a spot about three miles from Last Stand Hill, today known as Weir Point, but could go no further and were forced back to the logistic train by overwhelming numbers of enemy. The Last Stand The truth is, nobody really knows what happened to Custer and his men, other than they all got killed. We'll never know if Custer realized his predicament until it was too late. He was always on offense, always on the attack. Earlier in the fight, Custer sent his bugler, John Martin, back to Reno and Benteen with a message to catch up fast and bring the extra ammo. The position on Last Stand Hill suggests a very hasty and desperate defense with the cavalrymen killing their horses to get some cover. Custer may have gone to his death thinking reinforcements would be here any minute if they could just hold on. We don't know what time the last stand started or how long it lasted. Custer had been decisively engaged in a running battle for two to three hours before they found themselves cut off and surrounded. The best historical guess is that it started around 4:00 PM and lasted less than an hour. Some say it was as little as 20 minutes. Forensic evidence suggests that the Indians low crawled through the grass-filled coulees towards the troopers, popping up to fire then dropping back down. It's quite probable that the only thing Custer's men saw until the final rush was heads bobbing up and down all over the place. One thing both sides seem to agree on - the popular picture of Indians riding wildly in a circle around Custer is a myth.
At the end, a group of men on Last Stand Hill made a run for it on foot in a desperate attempt to reach the cover of the river. Could it be that Custer was already dead? It's hard to imagine Custer's troopers bugging out while he was still fighting. One of those who made the dash was the regimental surgeon. Would the doc have bolted if Custer were still alive? There is a trail that leads downhill from the Visitor's Center to a large coulee called the Deep Ravine. Headstones along the trail mark where cavalry men were run down and killed, along with their names, if known. Some accounts say they fought their way down, forming a skirmish line along the way. Others say it was a headlong rush. A small group made it to the ravine, thinking it was a covered route to the river. It wasn't. It went to the river alright, but was the main avenue of approach for the Indians from their encampment to the battle area. They lined the top of the ravine and poured fire into it, leaving no survivors. This was the final action of Custer's Last Stand. All 210 men - troopers, civilians, scouts - were killed, 39 of them on Last Stand Hill itself. As for Custer himself, we don't know the exact circumstances of his death. National Park Service guides say he was killed by a bullet to the left temple on Last Stand Hill. That pretty much rules out suicide ("save the last bullet for yourself") since Custer was right-handed. Other reports say he bled to death from a chest wound received down by the river and may not have even been functional during the Last Stand. So even though Custer's un-mutilated body was recovered two days later and presumably examined, there isn't even a consensus on this topic. So it goes at the Little Bighorn.
The battle didn't end with the Last Stand. In fact, the Indians most likely didn't know who they had just killed. After finishing off Custer and his men, the warriors turned their attention to Major Reno, Custer's second-in-command, and the logistics wagon train about four miles away. Reno had time to prepare a hasty defense and the battle raged until dark, when the Indians withdrew. The troopers spent the night preparing defensive positions. A party of 19 men volunteered for the hair-raising task of going down the bluff to the river to get desperately needed water. They succeeded and all 19 received the Medal of Honor. The battle was joined again at first light. Reno held on until reinforcements arrived. In a logistical marvel of their own, the 7,000 person Native American camp was gone the next morning, ending the Battle of the Little Bighorn.
Aftermath of the Battle
Boston Custer and Henry Reed were both civilian teamsters for the Army. Boston left the pack train riding a mule to join his brothers forward, meeting John Martin on the way back with his message to Benteen. Martin had just run a gauntlet of Indian fire to get through and advised Boston to turn back. Boston pressed on and made it. Henry was already there, having convinced his uncles earlier to take him along. When they died, George was 36, Tom was 31, Boston was 28 and Henry Reed was 18.
Lt. James Calhoun, who died in his own last stand, was married to Custer's younger sister, Maggie. Normally Custer's Adjutant, he assumed temporary command of Company L just before the battle. Some Indian accounts of the battle mention the fight on Calhoun Hill as being the fiercest of the day. Of the estimated 100 KIA suffered by the Indians that day, over 30 of them were found on Calhoun Hill.
Crazy Horse, who spent most of his adult life at war and never had his picture taken, surrendered at Camp Robinson, Nebraska in May of 1877. He lived quietly in a nearby tribal village until September 4, when his arrest was ordered. After being transported to the guardhouse, Crazy Horse struggled with the guards and tried to escape. In the fight, he was bayoneted and died later that night. His body was turned over to his parents. His final resting place is unknown. Under his leadership, the Native American warriors had won decisively at the Little Bighorn but it was a Pyrrhic victory. The public and government both were outraged that this could happen to an army unit led by Custer and only a week before the nation's centennial. They demanded harsh retribution - and they got it. Crazy Horse surrendered 11 months later and was dead three months after that. The Native American federation that won the battle fell apart and the tribes were killed, dispersed or rounded up. In winning at the Little Bighorn, the Plains Indians probably hastened their own end. There is one last historical footnote. The Battle of the Little Bighorn is often called the greatest loss the U.S. Army ever suffered in the campaigns against the Native Americans. Not true. That dubious distinction belongs to the Battle of the Wabash on November 4, 1791. That battle was fought near present day Fort Recovery, Ohio and resulted in the deaths of almost 1,000 U.S. soldiers. That was close to half of America's standing army at that time, effectively leaving President George Washington with no army. However, it would be a true statement to say the Little Bighorn was the Army's greatest loss in the Plains Indian Wars of the mid to late 19th century. There are many questions about the Battle of the Little Bighorn that will never be answered. The one that haunts battlefield addicts the most is - "What really happened on Last Stand Hill?" Your guess is as good as anybody else's. The Little Bighorn today
The Little Bighorn Battlefield is a fascinating place. We've been there several times and plan to return. It's much bigger than we had envisioned - almost five miles long and two miles wide. The terrain is extremely rugged and boy, is it hot. The ground is pretty much just like it was during the battle, so it's possible to get a good perspective and understanding of what happened. There is a self-guided driving tour that runs the length of the battlefield. Before that, you want to take in the ranger talk about the battle at the Visitor's Center. If you visit the Little Bighorn on the anniversary of the battle, there are re-enactors and guides at the major sites to answer questions and provide information. The NPS also allows walking around on parts of the battlefield that are normally closed. Be sure to take the trail down to the Deep Ravine. There's an overlook with information placards. Where ever you go, watch out for rattlesnakes! There's only one geocache here. It's a virtual cache called Little Bighorn National Monument. The answers that you need are actually on the Last Stand monument. There's a handful of traditional caches up the road in Hardin and more along the highways. You can pick up literally dozens of caches in Montana by just cruising the Interstates with the highest speed limit in the country. Billings on the other hand is sitting on a sea of geocaches as are most Big Sky cities. The GPS coordinates of the Visitors Center are N45.5221º, W107.3778º. Click on the coordinates to open an interactive Google map. If the decimal degree format doesn't agree with you, here's a lat/long converter. If you can't make it to the battlefield, you can check out their live webcam. Garryowen!
|